Could Jackson Pollock have been a decent Art Director?
Why the art of design matters
Would Mr. Pollock have been able to survive today’s “office politics” and summon his talent at will?
Was he really the creative genius of his generation, or just some lucky schlub with a lousy temper and a propensity for booze, who simply stumbled upon creative brilliance?
Considering Pollock’s qualifications
Paul Jackson Pollock, an American painter, became a major influence in the abstract expressionist movement of the 1940s and throughout his brief, but brilliant, painting career. A reclusive artist, an alcoholic, and known in most circles to have a volatile personality, Pollock was not born to greatness. Yet still, an unflinching dedication to the exploration of his craft perpetuated Pollock to achieve creative brilliance on the world’s stage.
He established what’s known today as the “drip technique”: a process of pouring and/or dripping resin-based liquefied paints onto a flat surface, then manipulating the mixture with a stick rather than brush. This technique is widely considered the origin of the term “action painting.”
Pollock’s ingenuity and brilliance quite literally turned the art community upside-down and opened the door to an entirely new method of creating art — as well as viewing it.
Pollock: good candidate for an art director?
Well, we can certainly say that his work inspired our world with creativity and vision. And for what it’s worth, I believe Pollock was the real deal creatively.
If Mr. Pollock were alive today and in search of an Art Director position, I would gladly hire him. Beyond the personal flaws (and yes, we all have a few), his raw talent and unbridled tenacity to push design and technique beyond the norm are attributes that any good Art Director should possess. A willingness to go out into the ether and explore the unexplored is more than daunting, and Pollock did so with both passion and grace.
I believe that if we can understand and capture even a Lilliputian portion of Pollock’s spirit (sans some of his more obvious flaws), it would enlighten and help us all to reach that elusive greatness dwelling deep within.
Do you agree?
Fodder for our next conversation, copywriting: William Faulkner and Jack Kerouac – bloated windbags or advertising prodigies?
Photo above is from http://jacksonpollock.com.
Tags: Advertising, Creative, Design, Marketing
This entry was posted on Thursday, March 4th, 2010 at 8:30 am and is filed under Advertising, Creative, Design, Marketing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “Could Jackson Pollock have been a decent Art Director?”
-
kapsel Says:
I didn’t understand the concluding part of your article, could you please explain it more?
-
Miller Brooks Says:
I’d be happy to — which portion of the conclusion is unclear? You can copy and paste it into your comment.
- « Older Entries
- Newer Entries »

